What Missiologists Think

According to missiologist Craig Ott (2021) postcolonial thought is the critique of attempts by one culture to impose their worldview onto another. But Ott warns against a naive attitude that opposes cultural change in general, contrary to the fact that this is an obvious reality in our modern, globalizing world. He also contends that cross-cultural teachers will inevitably be agents of culture change, so they must seek to do so intentionally and profitably. And since no culture perfectly represents the biblical worldview, part of Christian practice is mutual intercultural exhortation. Ott describes the impetus for worldview change as a person coming to realize that “the way they have understood the world so far can no longer account for their present experience”. And such change is not motivated merely by information, human reasoning is based on emotional narratives imbibed in our upbringing. It is only through alternative narratives that one’s conception of reality can change and cause the reshaping of an individual’s identity and values (Ott, 2021, p. 160-167). 

So people will only be persuaded by the biblical worldview if it is linked to local issues and is a story people can “identify with, remember and which will have a life changing impact” (Bartle, 2005, p. 185). For biblical concepts to influence traditional religious cultures, these concepts must be associated with indigenous symbols. Then these symbols can be used to integrate a traditional culture with the world of Scripture “into a holistic Christian application of faith to life” (Zahniser, 1997, p. 13). 

Missiologists Lingenfelter & Lingenfelter (2003) also recognize that every culture is a source of bondage and should so be challenged by teachers (p. 88). Although cultural stability and continuity are necessary for individual and community flourishing, social practices that contradict our values should be confronted. Experiential learning is a technique consisting of “doing and reflecting on what happened”, learning begins with concrete experience followed by reflective observations that lead to the formation of abstract generalizations. The motivation and ability to change behavior comes from students’ experience of discomfort or dissonance, whose cause when recognized can be mitigated against. Experiential learning is effective in promoting change because it focuses on “experience and emotional responses” rather than information. But creating powerful simulations that connect abstract concepts and concrete experiences is more challenging than just lecturing. Still, simulations of experience followed by group and personal reflection can affect change like that which long-term mentoring relationships would produce. From a Christian perspective, ultimately no educational method can produce transformation, only trials, repentance, and obedience to biblical teaching can do that (Lingenfelter & Lingenfelter 2003, p. 89-98). 

What Intercultural Education Experts Think

Geneva Gay (2018) of the University of Washington critiques “micro-level changes” made by short-term educational projects with limited influence on the wider learning culture (p. 275). Gay asserts that this approach won’t generate significant change (p. 275). And change is possible only when educators stop advocating for a return to traditions from a past that marginalized many ethnic minorities. Culturally responsive teaching (CRT) will only change the culture when it is a required part of teacher training, rather than an optional approach. Gay also advocates for holistic approaches to change in education that deal with students’ “ethic and cultural particularities, and their individual uniqueness”. Ultimately, the motivation for change through CRT is the development of students who help make society more “equitable, receptive, and reflective of diverse peoples, experiences, perspectives, and contributions”. This formation must begin in early childhood when students’ ideas about race are being shaped. Merely recognizing the value of CRT is not enough, it must be implemented, and field-based training helps knowledge and practice “reinforce and refine each other” (Gay, 2018, p. 277-290). 

In Developing Fundamental Orientations for Teaching, Villegas & Lucas (2002) advocate for teachers seeing themselves as agents of chance who see “schools and society as interconnected” (p. 55). This involves recognizing that the potential education must challenge societal injustice is more often substituted by a tendency to reproduce the thinking and behavior of the dominant cultural group (Villegas & Lucas, 2002, p. 55). 

Dealing with Controversial Issues: Social Studies in Africa

Lewis Asimeng-Boahene (2007) researched strategies for dealing with controversial issues in social studies education in African schools. He argues that the increased approximation and interdependence of nations increases the importance of social studies educators’ role in preparing children to live in “tomorrow’s global village” (p. 232). The African continent is a particular challenge involving the need to navigate controversial issues while community taboos often prevent open discussion. Asimeng-Boahene argues that decisions about what issues should or should not be discussed need to be based on what fulfills the long-term goals of the school in its community. Introducing controversial issues into classroom discussion sparks students’ interest and encourages civic participation. It also teaches students how to face and resolve conflict and controversy in a “rational, thoughtful, and sensitive manner” (Asimeng-Boahene, 2007, p. 232-233). 

I recognize the benefits of a teacher not committing to a particular position about a controversial issue. But I agree with experts that recommend a teacher never introduce a subject they are not willing to comment on personally, i.e., beliefs and values (Hoge et al., 2004; Martorella et al., 2005). 

How to Teach for Cultural Change Ethically

My context of service is primarily ecumenical meetings of Christian leaders from diverse traditions working on issues of reconciliation. Participants come from churches that have different concepts about what type of issues should be discussed publicly and how that should be conducted. This type of work requires a balance of challenging participants to step outside their comfort zones while respecting their convictions. Our gatherings have people from conservative and liberal/progressive church traditions and it is often a challenge to go beyond niceties to get real work done while avoiding unfruitful controversy. Experts in discussing controversial issues in education recommend inviting respected members of the community to participate (Adeyemi, 2000). In an ecumenical reconciliation themed event, I would apply this principle to the need for local hosts to be given a place of honor. In general, this has been the approach of the reconciliation events I have participated in. Local Christian leaders are given a role of host and convener whose presence mitigates against the appearance of indifference to community context. 

Villegas and Lucas (2002) observe the difficulty of teachers having influence outside the classroom due to the hierarchical culture of schools (p. 56). Teachers are so bogged down with teaching and bureaucratic duties that becoming change agents is an unreasonable endeavor. Making things worse is the postmodern critique of peer relations that creates “a sense of despair (…) that all actions are oppressive and that human agency is an illusion”. For this reason, I agree with the assessment that teachers must encourage “both critique and hope in equal measure” (Villegas and Lucas, 2002, p. 56-58). 

In the context of my ecumenical reconciliation work, the “teaching” is expressed in the mode of round-table discussions. Leaders representing diverse church traditions interact as equals seeking the healing of historic divisions through prayer, repentance, and advocacy. The central motif of much of our work is the Ephesians 2 vision of one new humanity describing the church as a prophetic image of intercultural reconciliation. The concept of being a teacher as an ethical Christian change agent should find direct application to the work I am involved in. Ecumenism that seeks to fulfill the vision of John 17:21 must not be introverted and concerned only with the benefits of reconciliation to the global communion of Christian faith. Our efforts at reconciliation within the church must have a clear goal to bring the fruits of this work to bear on the injustices that plague our world. 

Experts recommend that teachers as agents of social change seek to do so as part of collaborative projects (Villegas & Lucas, 2002, p. 63). I find application of this principle to the work I am involved in, where reconciliation advocates must avoid the discouragement that comes with trying to work alone. Neither schools, nor ecumenical meetings are sufficient to bring about social justice. What is needed is “collaborative communities working for change” in ways that go beyond the spheres of individual change agents. 

References

Adeyemi, M. B. (2000) Teaching conflict resolution to social studies students in Botswana, The Social Studies, 91(1), 38–41.

Hoge, J. D. et al. (2004) Real-world investigations for social studies (Columbus, OH, Pearson/Merrill/

Prentice Hall).

Ott, C. (2021). Teaching and learning across cultures: A guide to theory and practice. (Lower Level LC1099. O83 2021). Baker Academic

Bartle, Neville. 2005. Death, Witchcraft and the Spirit World in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea. Goroka, Papua New Guinea: Melanesian Institute.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. (Lower Level LC1099.3. G393 2018; Third edition.). Teachers College Press

Lewis Asimeng‐Boahene (2007) Creating strategies to deal with problems of teaching controversial issues in social studies education in African schools, Intercultural Education, 18:3, 231-242, DOI: 10.1080/14675980701463588

Lingenfelter, J., & Lingenfelter, S. (2003). Teaching cross culturally: An incarnational model for learning and teaching. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Martorella, P., Beal, H., Candy, M. & Bolick, C. M (2005) Teaching social studies in middle and

secondary schools (4th edn) (Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson).

Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Zahniser, A. H. Matthias. 1997. Symbol and Ceremony: Making Disciples across Cultures. Monrovia, CA: MARC.