Giving our Life Stories Structure and Coherence

According to Goodson et al. (2010), stories can either give our lives “structure, coherence and meaning” or inversely they can provide “the backdrop against which we experience our lives as complex, fragmented or without meaning” (p. 1). These stories don’t just help us understand ourselves, they constitute who we are(Goodson, 2010, p. 1). We create these stories, finding in them meaning, direction, and support for dealing with circumstances and our identities in them (Goodson, 2010, p. 2). Rather than consisting in learning fromthe stories of our lives and selves, narrative learning happens “in and through the narration” (Goodson, 2010, p. 2). 

We can deliberately engage in constructing narrative through autobiographical work (Goodson, 2010, p. 2). Bateson’s (1994) model for narrative learning involves “recognition of experience, reflection, and reconstruction, which are interrelated as a spiral”. Spiral learning consists of navigating complexity “with partial understanding, allowing for later returns” (Bateson, 1994, p.243). Learning as we move forward, we reflect on experiences and reconstruct them during our lives (Liu, 2015, p. 21). 

Stage theory is a common approach to understanding an individual’s life. But Cohler (1982) states that narrative “may offer a better understanding of the life course than stage theory because it closely parallels the storying process that people use in making meaning of their own lives”. This frees the exercise from constricting models of life progression, as if individual’s lives would always follow one of a set of predictable patterns. 

According to Polkinghorne (1995), narrative discourse “draws together diverse events, happenings, and actions of human lives into thematically unified goal directed purposes” (p. 5). We use narratives to “inform our decisions by constructing imaginative ‘what if’ scenarios” hopefully coming to see that what we have received outweighs what we have lost (Polkinghorne, 1998, p. 14).

Helping Explain Why Our Lives Deviate from “the Norm”

Bruner (1990) describes the function of narratives as specifically “to find an intentional state that mitigates or at least makes comprehensible a deviation from canonical cultural patterns” (p. 49-50). Narrative forms are both “socially patterned” and “personally inscribed”, meaning that understanding the social involves taking personal stories seriously “in their own terms and not just as the expression of something underlying or overarching” (Goodson, 2010, p. 126-7). And as a collaborative creative activity, narrative learning consists in both the way we tell a story and how the receiver interprets it (Liu, 2015, p. 4; Czanniawska, 1997). 

We establish coherence in our narratives by finding connections between the variety of experiences that bombard us with daily (Clark & Rossiter, 2008, p. 62). This coherence is often found in specific cultural narratives, which if identified can be critiqued and countered with alternative narratives (Clark & Rossiter, 2008, p. 62). Indeed, all narratives are situated in culture and tied to it (Clark, 2010, p. 3). However, there is also individual agency in creating narratives, as the speaker connects events into a sequence in order to act on them later and impress meaning upon their listeners (Reissman, 2008, p. 3). Events perceived by the speaker are selected, organized, connected, and evaluated as meaningful for a particular audience” (p. 3). Important to notice is that narrative is always social, i.e. “there is always an audience (real or imagined, the other or even the self) and that fact shapes the structure and determines the purpose of the narrative” (Clark, 2010, p. 4). 

Sarbin (1993) describes our world as “story-shaped” (p. 63), full of “folklore, myth, popular culture (carried by modalities such as movies, television, YouTube, music, and the like), social scripts, religious traditions and parables, political discourses, history, literature”, and so on (Clark, 2010, p. 4). All these forms embody cultural values providing “libraries of plots. . .[that] help us interpret our own and other people’s experience” (Sarbin, 1993, p. 59). These narratives “establish what constitutes normalcy by defining reasonable causality and plausibility” (Linde, 1993). 

Personal Narrative Exercises

Some educators have used imaginative role-playing to help learners encounter a tangible experience, by pretending they were someone else in a different context (Marunda-Piki, 2018, p. 109). Research indicates the effectiveness of narrative exercises where adult learners tell stories “using plenty of gestures, facial expressions, and a degree of dramatization using tone of voice and mime (Sawyer, 1965; Colwell, 1980; Grainger, 1997). 

Christian educators have used narrative learning to help students understand the stories they believed about themselves considering Christ’s work on the cross” (Foote, 2015, p. 118). The call to a new life of faith is seen as “a call for Christians to rethink their thinking”, citing Scripture attesting to how the world has blinded the unbeliever from the light of the gospel (II Cor. 4:4). Emphasis is placed on the believer’s new life in Christ (II Cor. 5:17), and their call to be transformed by the renewing of the mind (Rom. 12:2) (Foote, 2015, p. 118). 

Asking adult learners to write narrative essays about their lives is a means of “connecting what they have learned from current experiences to those in the past as well to possible future situations” (Foote, 2015, p. 120). According to Kolb’s experiential learning model, “concrete experiences can lead to personal reflection on the experience. This reflection then leads to abstract conceptualization, which might manifest itself in a set of conclusions or rules of thumb derived from the experience as well as insight into applicable theories or other concepts” (Colvin, 2012, p. 94). Since adults form their identities through their experiences, by critically reflecting upon prior learning through written narratives students can “reshape and renew their identities” (Foote, 2015, p. 121). 

Psychologists use therapeutic interventions that involve “the co-construction of healing narratives in the face of personal, moral, and social adversity” (Lieblich, McAdams, and Josselson , 2004). In White and Epston’s (1990) narrative therapy process clients are helped to re-story their lives, editing the plot to better serve them. This helps the client distinguish different stories to the problem narrative that led them into therapy. Frank (1995) identifies three types of illness narratives: “restitution narrative centers around the (hoped for) return of good health; the chaos narrative has no center—it is disturbingly lacking in coherence and therefore in sense making; and the quest narrative seeks to use the illness to gain something of value”. 

Clark and Rossiter (2008) argue that the nature of experience is always prelinguistic, “it is ‘languaged’ after the fact, and the process of narrating it is how learners give meaning to the experience” (p. 64). Therefore, it is via the construction of narrative that experience becomes accessible, and the way it is constructed determines the meaning it will have for the individual or group. (Clark and Rossiter, 2008, p. 64).

Clark and Rossiter (2008) developed three modes of narrative learning. In the learning journalassignment, participants articulate what they are learning “in a sustained, regular way” by journaling (p. 67). Participants enter a conversation between themselves and the learning material in focus, connecting prior experiences with new ones, comparing prior assumptions with new ideas. In concept-focused autobiographical writing, students write a paper with their life story as the subject, to “construct a narrative of their life experience, which must cohere in terms of a given concept and illuminate that concept” (Clark and Rossiter, 2008. P. 68). In instructional case studies, a problem is presented that must be solved or an issue to be addressed, “and this is the location of the learning because the problem or issue is complex, reflecting real-world practice” (Clark and Rossiter, 2008. P. 68). The point is less finding the solution to the problem than discovering “how to decide what to do” (Clark and Rossiter, 2008. P. 68). They are “learning to think like practitioners, which involves putting theoretical concepts in conversation with prior experience to come up with new insights and interpretations” (Clark and Rossiter, 2008. P. 68).

Conclusion

            The most compelling idea in my study of narrative learning is that people either see their lives as coherent and meaningful or chaotic and absurd. What a tragedy for people who find themselves in a story whose beginning, middle, and end don’t make any sese or have purpose. The Bible states that everyone was created for a purpose (Eph. 2:10; Ps. 139:14-16), a simple message but one that so many distraught and alienated people need to know. 

            Unfortunately, the Bible is full of stories of people who knew God whose stories began so promisingly but ended up in tragedy. These were the followers of God, the heroes of the faith. If we can learn to see our lives in the perspective of the God who shapes and forms, forgives and redeems, we should always be able to find hope. 

References

Bateson, M.C. (1994). Peripheral Visions: Learning Along the Way. New York: Harper Collins. 

Bruner, Jerome S. (1990) Acts of Meaning (the Jerusalem-Harvard Lectures) , Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Clark, M. C., & Rossiter, M. (2008). Narrative learning in adulthood. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 2008(119), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.306 

Clark, M. C. (2010). Narrative Learning: Its Contours and Its Possibilities. Part of a Special Issue: Narrative Perspectives on Adult Education, (126), 3–11. https:// doi.org/10.1002/ace.367 

Cohler, B. J. “Personal Narrative and the Life Course.” In P. B. Baltes and O. G. Brim, Jr. (eds.), Life-span Development and Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1982. 

Colwell, E. (1980) Storytelling (London, The Bodley Head).

Colvin, J. (2012). Earn college credit for what you know (5th ed.). Chicago, IL: Kendall Hunt.

Czanniawska, B (1997). Narrating the Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

Foote, L. S. (2015). Re-Storying Life as a Means of Critical Reflection: The Power of Narrative Learning. Christian Higher Education, 14(3), 116–126. Academic Search Premier.

Frank, A. W. The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics. Chicago: University of 

Chicago Press, 1995.

Goodson, I. F., Biesta, Gert., Tedder, M., & Adair, N. (2010). Narrative Learning. Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/biola-ebooks/detail.action?docID=487967

Grainger, T. (1997) Traditional storytelling in the primary classroom (Leamington Spa, Scholastic. 

Lieblich, A., McAdams, D. P., and Josselson, R. (eds.). Healing Plots: The Narrative Basis of Psychotherapy. Washington, D.C.: APA, 2004.

Linde, C. Life Stories. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Liu, X. (2015). Narrative Generates a Learning Spiral in Education: Recognition, Reflection, and Reconstruction. International Journal for Leadership in Learning, 1(3). ERIC. 

Polkinghorne, D. (1995) ‘Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis’, in J. A. Hatch and R. Wisniewski (eds) Life History and Narrative , London: Falmer.

Polkinghorne, D. (1998). Narrative Knowing and the Human Science. Albany: SUNY

Press.

Riessman, C. K. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2008.

Sarbin, T. R. “The Narrative as the Root Metaphor for Contextualism.” In S. C. Hayes, 

C. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, and T. R. Sarbin (eds.), Varieties of Scientific Contextualism. 

Reno, Nev.: Context Press, 1993.

Sawyer, R. (1965) The way of the storyteller (New York, The Viking Press); original work published 1942. 

White, M., and Epston, D. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York: Norton, 

1990.

---

 [DD1]Considering how personal narratives explain deviations from cultural patterns. In their personal narratives, participants could explore how they explain their involvement in Jewish-Christian reconciliation initiatives. (ONM)

 [DD2]Important albeit obvious point: our personal narratives are the result of the interaction of our own experiences and thoughts about them and the mutuality of these experiences and reflections within our cultures. 

 [DD3]Participants can be asked who are the most important “receivers” to their self narrative and narrative of Jewish-Christian relations (ONM), as well as as how this audience affects the narrative?